Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · CFR · Title 14 — Aeronautics and Space · Part 107 — Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems · § 107.65

§ 107.65. Aeronautical knowledge recency.

186 words·~1 min read·/us/cfr/t14/s§ 107.65·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

A person may not exercise the privileges of a remote pilot in command with small UAS rating unless that person has accomplished one of the following in a manner acceptable to the Administrator within the previous 24 calendar months:
(a)Passed an initial aeronautical knowledge test covering the areas of knowledge specified in § 107.73;
(b)Completed recurrent training covering the areas of knowledge specified in § 107.73; or
(c)If a person holds a pilot certificate (other than a student pilot certificate) issued under part 61 of this chapter and meets the flight review requirements specified in § 61.56, completed training covering the areas of knowledge specified in § 107.74.
(d)A person who has passed a recurrent aeronautical knowledge test in a manner acceptable to the Administrator or who has satisfied the training requirement of paragraph
(c)of this section prior to April 6, 2021 within the previous 24 calendar months is considered to be in compliance with the requirement of paragraph
(b)or
(c)of this section, as applicable. [Amdt. 107-8, 86 FR 4382, Jan. 15, 2021; 86 FR 13631, Mar. 10, 2021]
Connections3 cite this
Citation graph
cites case law
§ 107.65
Aeronautical knowledge recency.
Fed. Reg.×3
Cites 0Cited by 3 across 1 source
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.